Independent Technical Authority in Hazardous Area Assurance

Delivering compliance across ATEX, DSEAR, Process Safety, Fire Safety and Hazardous Area Management.

XES Solutions

Vector

XES is an independent assurance and risk management consultancy, specialising in explosion safety, hazardous area compliance and process risk management.

The leading provider of hazardous area compliance and safety assurance, supporting major operators, EPCs and asset owners across the UK and internationally.

We deliver comprehensive, independent expertise across ATEX, DSEAR, Process Safety and Fire Safety helping clients meet complex regulatory requirements in high risk environments.

Serving as named Technical Authority for multiple organisations, we provide consistent, high-quality assurance services aligned with UK legislation and international best practice.

Our Services

Specialist assurance, risk management and compliance services tailored for high risk industries.

Our Projects

17/04/25

Assessing DSEAR and ATEX Compliance for R290 Heat Pump Systems in The Netherlands

20/12/24

Delivering a full Explosion Protection Document (EPD) and DSEAR compliance review for Bakels

19/03/24

Helping Saltend Chemicals Park with ATEX Zone 1 compliance of a pedestal crane

Appoint XES as your independent Technical Authority in explosion risk and regulatory compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions about DSEAR, ATEX, Process Safety, Fire Safety, engineering management or explosion safety compliance?

These FAQs cover the most common queries we receive – But if you need tailored advice, get in touch.

I already have a DSEAR Risk Assessment – what are the benefits of having a Technical Authority?

Many organisations assume that once they have a DSEAR Risk Assessment, they are fully compliant. In reality, the risk assessment is only one part of meeting legal obligations. Compliance requires that the assessment is carried out by a competent person or body, that its recommendations are implemented and that processes are in place to maintain ongoing control.

Appointing a Technical Authority provides the assurance that these steps are being managed correctly. A Technical Authority validates that the risk assessment has been applied in practice, ensures zoning and ignition risk decisions are technically sound and confirms that control measures and documentation remain aligned with legislation. This independent oversight strengthens defensibility, gives clear ownership of decisions and provides confidence in the event of audits, enforcement action or incident investigations.

What’s the difference between ATEX and UKCA (UKEX)?

ATEX is the EU directive covering equipment and protective systems in explosive atmospheres. In the UK, this has been replaced by the UKCA (UKEX) marking. Both require conformity assessment and documentation, but UKCA is regulated under UK law. The UK government has extended recognition of CE marking for placing ATEX products on the market in Great Britain indefinitely beyond December 2024. The decision to apply UKEX on products being placed on the market in Great Britain is now the manufacturer’s choice.

This means that as 2025, manufacturers can choose to use either:

CE marking under ATEX (EU regulations), or UKCA marking under UKEX (UK regulations).

Both are currently accepted in the UK market, though the technical requirements of UKEX mirror those of ATEX.

What is the value of structured process safety studies?

Structured process safety studies provide a systematic, engineering led approach to hazard identification and risk reduction across all phases of the plant lifecycle. Techniques such as HAZID, HAZOP, LOPA, and SIL determination enable traceable evaluation of initiating events, safeguard effectiveness, and tolerable risk criteria in line with ALARP principles.

These studies form the technical backbone of a site’s safety case or explosion protection strategy ensuring that risk reduction measures are not only applied, but justified. Conducted at defined project gateways, they support functional safety compliance (e.g. IEC 61511), facilitate design stage intervention and create a defensible basis for operational and maintenance decisions under DSEAR, COMAH, and wider regulatory frameworks.

What role do FRA and FERA play in managing fire and explosion risk?

A Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) evaluates fire hazards, means of escape, detection and protection systems to ensure compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. It is a legal requirement for most premises and forms the foundation of a site’s fire safety management strategy.

A Fire and Explosion Risk Assessment (FERA) goes further, incorporating both fire and explosion scenarios such as flash fires, pool fires, jet fires, and vapour cloud explosions (VCE) often in higher risk or COMAH regulated environments. FERA integrates consequence modelling, escalation risk and cross-discipline interfaces with DSEAR, ATEX, and process safety.

At XES, we deliver both FRA and FERA ensuring that fire and explosion risks are not only identified but understood, mitigated and fully defensible.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields